.:.:.:.:RTTP.Mobile:.:.:.:.
[<--back] [Home][Pics][News][Ads][Events][Forum][Band][Search]
full forum | bottom

jump pages:[all|1|2]

pretty fucked up

[views:14039][posts:98]
 _____________________________
[Mar 22,2007 9:56pm - ZJD ""]
hungtableed said:ZJD said:hungtableed said: What I said is that I, personally, think it is wrong and un-natural. I never even said that they weren't human, I just think what they do is un-natural and wrong.


I'll reiterate; how did you come to this conclusion?



Because asses are for shitting out of - not so dudes who have a twisted perversion have a hole to put their dick in.



And mouths are for eating and talking, right? How about lady-butt?

Men don't fuck vaginas just because that's "what they're for," but because they're predominantly attracted to women, want to fuck something, and enjoy the vajay. Certainly men, the ones with dicks, are mostly attracted to women, the ones with vaginas, for a reason, but if desire is neccessary, then doesn't that mean a man's desire for man-butt is as natural as another's for poonaner?



 _______________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:02pm - hungtableed  ""]
I wouldn't fuck my old lady's ass even if she asked for it. I'd respond with something like "ugggghh, there's a perfectly good vagina less than 2 inches away- I'm going for the hole that's wet.
Like I said hours ago here: It's quite obvious that your opinion is going to have as much impact in changing mine as my opinion will have changing yours. Just like we all have assholes (that are, IMHO, meant for shitting out of only) we all got opinions. How about we agree that we disagree. Arguing about this is obviously going no where, really fast. Geez, that's the greatest liberty Americans are endowed with. Which is that at the end of the day we can believe what we want even though other people will be willing to fight tooth and nail to convince you that you're wrong.
 ________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:07pm - Murph ""]
hungtableed said:Murph said:


Actually, my friend, you equated homosexuality with pedophilia, and since pedophilia is a crime, you purported homosexuality to be a crime or on the same level on a crime. That would be saying they should be denied or persecuted for that particular choice, and that is disregard for someone's basic human and in this country, American right.

I honor free speech as much as anyone. But I hold people to actual remember and understand what the fuck they say.



I didn't equate them. It's called a simile.
You obviously lack reading comprehension skills. I said that fags are just perverts who get off by fucking people of the same sex. Just like (refer to http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=simile ) pedos who are perverts that get off by fucking/touching kids. I called them both perverts, I never equated boys fucking boys with old dudes touching kids. Besides, I'd estimate that 80% of pedophilia as being of the homosexual persuasion - I read the news and it's an all too common story I see often.




I forgot how smart you are. Maybe you should look up the definition of pervert. A perversion is something not socially acceptable, i.e. something that is against what society deems OK. Therefore, pretty much against societal law.

Therefore, young scholar, you equated them as both being outside of social acceptance. It's called a conditional statement, where you do not equate two things on their individual merit, but in the way they are viewed against each other, within the same criterion.

And your estimate, of 80% is not even close.

And if I was not able to understand simile, then you also misuse the word like, as LIKE is used to compare two things in a SIMILAR fashion, hence SIMILE. First you say you did not equate the two, then used a self-purported figure to assert their similarity, but still maintain you were not placing homosexuality and pedophilia as like "perversions."

You just might be an idiot wrapped in a moron.
 ______________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:10pm - ZJD ""]
hungtableed said:I wouldn't fuck my old lady's ass even if she asked for it. I'd respond with something like "ugggghh, there's a perfectly good vagina less than 2 inches away- I'm going for the hole that's wet.
Like I said hours ago here: It's quite obvious that your opinion is going to have as much impact in changing mine as my opinion will have changing yours. Just like we all have assholes (that are, IMHO, meant for shitting out of only) we all got opinions. How about we agree that we disagree. Arguing about this is obviously going no where, really fast. Geez, that's the greatest liberty Americans are endowed with. Which is that at the end of the day we can believe what we want even though other people will be willing to fight tooth and nail to convince you that you're wrong.



If you want to end it then it will end and I'm sure I won't change your mind and know you won't change mine, but I'd like to continue this conversation until you at least answer my questions.

What about the mouth? Is that "for" sucking?
Do you think the desire for men itself is not naturally found in a gay man/do you think it's a choice?
If you are down with blowjobs, then what about gay dudes that just have oral sex (they do exist)?
 ________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:15pm - Murph ""]
hungtableed said:I wouldn't fuck my old lady's ass even if she asked for it. I'd respond with something like "ugggghh, there's a perfectly good vagina less than 2 inches away- I'm going for the hole that's wet.
Like I said hours ago here: It's quite obvious that your opinion is going to have as much impact in changing mine as my opinion will have changing yours. Just like we all have assholes (that are, IMHO, meant for shitting out of only) we all got opinions. How about we agree that we disagree. Arguing about this is obviously going no where, really fast. Geez, that's the greatest liberty Americans are endowed with. Which is that at the end of the day we can believe what we want even though other people will be willing to fight tooth and nail to convince you that you're wrong.



So, gay Americans should have a voice and be able to argue with the same freedom from fear for that voice?

When that happens, then debate them. But having a government-endorsement that homosexuals are "different" and not entitled to all the same rights as hetero-mericans you have an American hand way stronger than theirs.
 _______________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:19pm - hungtableed  ""]
ok, so it my example of fags/pedos was a metaphor. Sue me. I'm sorry that my views on fags offended your vehement pro-gay stance.
Wasn't this thread about Blackwater? It was and then I made a joke relating one's pacifistic viewpoint as "gay". Next thing you know, all the pro-homos came out in venomous opposition to my use of the word because it is obvious that they were just so damn offended by it. Next time I'm out drinking and a friend of mine is so fucking hammered he says "man, I'm retarded" I gonna get all pissy and say "what do you got against mentally challenged people - they're people too!" Political Correctness is gay.
 _______________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:25pm - hungtableed  ""]
Murph said:

So, gay Americans should have a voice and be able to argue with the same freedom from fear for that voice?

When that happens, then debate them. But having a government-endorsement that homosexuals are "different" and not entitled to all the same rights as hetero-mericans you have an American hand way stronger than theirs.


where exactly did say I support a "government-endorsement that homosexuals are "different" " - I expressed my opinion on fags. I never said a damned thing about American homos not deserving the same rights as heteros- you my friend are jumping to conclusions. I don't think anyone who is a citizen of this country should be barred any right that is enjoyed by everyone else.
 _______________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:28pm - hungtableed  ""]
I am more inclined to believe that homosexuality is a perversion (I'm sorry, for the pc mental masturbators - a sexual preference) that was a choice and not a natural tendency. Science has proven, thus far, that queers are no different than straight people - they're just sexually attracted to the same sex.
 ______________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:34pm - ZJD ""]
hungtableed said:I am more inclined to believe that homosexuality is a perversion (I'm sorry, for the pc mental masturbators - a sexual preference) that was a choice and not a natural tendency.


Okay. So...

How did you come to this conclusion?

Also, if it's any consolation, I didn't read enough of the thread to see how this gay stuff started and don't care about political correctness.
 _______________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:40pm - hungtableed  ""]
It's my opinion - I can't help it, it's just how I see things. Just like my political beliefs, it's what I believe. I was never convinced by anyone/anything, it's just how I see shit. I'm sure you have your own beliefs where many of which were never shaped by any outside force, it's just how you see it.
 ______________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:44pm - ZJD ""]
Yeah, but I have a reason. I can explain why I believe things. I'm not saying every belief has to be grounded in fact or logic, but as for this one in particular, I figured you'd have a better one than "just 'cause," and I'm guessing you do.
 ________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:46pm - Murph ""]
hungtableed said:Murph said:

So, gay Americans should have a voice and be able to argue with the same freedom from fear for that voice?

When that happens, then debate them. But having a government-endorsement that homosexuals are "different" and not entitled to all the same rights as hetero-mericans you have an American hand way stronger than theirs.


where exactly did say I support a "government-endorsement that homosexuals are "different" " - I expressed my opinion on fags. I never said a damned thing about American homos not deserving the same rights as heteros- you my friend are jumping to conclusions. I don't think anyone who is a citizen of this country should be barred any right that is enjoyed by everyone else.



No, I'm just stating fact. Gay people don't have the same rights as heterosexuals. I used the term "government-endorsement" not to mean you personally endorse their treatment nor that you were relying on that for your argument, but that it's a given fact. It just kind of sucks, because you have the right all day to assert your distaste for homosexuals or just their sexual being, but they are fighting not only the norm when they debate, but also a government standard telling them they are wrong. It is unfair.

And frankly, I don't hold anyone's beliefs against them. I just feel everyone should be on a fair playing field, and as we are not, its not fair. This was a thread about privatized military groups, but then you made it seem those opposed to it were "less of men" or "lacking testicular fortitude" and that meant gay because those opposing you were exuding a gayness that was "rubbing off on you." The whole thing was just a real juvenile slam to those who were curious and put off by Blackwater.

 ___________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:47pm - brian_dc ""]
The Judeo-Christian religion is the sole creator of homophobia.

It's why Satanists are gay.
 ___________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:48pm - brian_dc ""]
also



brian_dc said:I WILL RESPOND WITH HOMOPHOBIA!


WAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRR! PORRRRRRRNNNN!



 _______________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 10:56pm - hungtableed  ""]
I was pretty certain that my gay remark was blatantly sarcastic - do you really think I immediately went to look up porn afterwards? Read around through even just the threads on the first page, I bet that you'll find a lot of sarcasm and juvenile criticism in regards to a number of issues here. I can't see how anyone that's sensitive to juvenile criticism and a stickler for political correctness could last more than 5 mins here.
 ___________________________________
[Mar 22,2007 11:08pm - brian_dc ""]
I don't really think you went to go look up porn. I've been teaching various ages of kids and I just notice how people (especially kids) use homophobia as a crutch, even if they are joking. So I goofed on it.

I mean, it's just a comical outline of your first response.


I've actually just started reading a book called "Homophobia: A History" by Byrne Fone.


Here's a fun fact:
in 1999 (the time of the authorship of the aforementioned book) forty states still allowed known homosexuals to be summarily fired from their jobs, without cause.

Presumably, that means that there were not available the proper channels to call discrimination on the firing on the grounds of sexuality. I'm just in the foreword, maybe I'll get more info on stuff like that.

 ____________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 12:45am - death2all ""]
deadlikemurf said:i really could give a shit less what blackwater does in iraq. we're already there so let them go kill people. i did however cringe a bit when he talked about them being deployed in new orleans after katrina. if there is any truth to this guy's report that he spoke with them and that they said the mission was that they were put there to confront and apprehend criminals, that's scary. i don't like at all the fact that there would be a corporate private company army in an american city enforcing law.


It is pretty common knowledge that blackwater is a government contracted military force operating in Iraq & elsewhere. It's not a secret that they're there, the problem is they shouldn't be there. Just like KBR/Halliburton shouldn't be there providing the military with food, water, laundry, fuel, & all the other shit that would normally be jobs of the military itself. KBR charges the U.S. military $28.00 per plate, to feed the troops. That adds up to $4,200,000 just to feed every soldier 1 meal! They've been there for 4yrs, do the math. These private contract companies are run by former pentagon & U.S. government big wigs. It's one big fuckin conflict of interest known as "The Military Industrial Complex". This is what U.S. war is all about. In Vietnam, it was Bell Hellicopter who cashed in on the cluster fuck. 6,000 Hellicopters were bought from Bell by the military during that war, at what price? I don't know, but it wasn't cheap. Bell Hellicopters ceo was a former pentagon based general. It's been happening since WW2.

That video is also the 4th different report I've seen of Blackwater operating in New Orleans after Katrina. That is very scary cause it bypasses the militarys inabillity to police it's own people. It's just too bad they didn't care enough to contract a private company, such as KBR/Halliburton to evacuate all the people who were trapped there for 5 fuckin days.

If this all sounds new & strange to people, they should go to Google Video & search for these things. Reality can't be found on tv anymore.
 _______________________________
[Mar 23,2007 12:58am - Lamp ""]
hungtableed said:It's my opinion - I can't help it, it's just how I see things.


Yes you can, you're just a pussy and don't want to help it.
 ______________________________
[Mar 23,2007 1:28am - Lamp ""]
Torment and torture, that's all you've done
Beat on those "pussies", your idea of fun
Can't stand the sight of a naked guy
Your mindset's intolerable, you need to die
 ____________________________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 3:38am - super happy funtime harry  ""]
see see what i meant to say is all faggots are niggers, not all niggers are faggots
 ______________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 7:54am - hungtableed  ""]
Lamp said:Torment and torture, that's all you've done
Beat on those "pussies", your idea of fun
Can't stand the sight of a naked guy
Your mindset's intolerable, you need to die



It pretty obvious that you like it up the ass. I hope you and your fuck buddy get AIDS.
 ______________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 8:12am - hungtableed  ""]
In all seriousness though, that statement from whatever ra-ra-posi-core song is contradictory. Telling someone they need to die because of the way they see shit seems like intolerance to me. And I never said I don't tolerate fags because I actually do, I just don't accept it.
 ______________________________
[Mar 23,2007 1:55pm - Lamp ""]
It's no posi-core shit, it's just funny.
 ______________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 1:56pm - hungtableed  ""]
yea, well it really has to be the gayest lyrics ever written.
 ______________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 1:58pm - hungtableed  ""]
I'm sorry, I have to be more pc. I must refrain from using the word 'gay' and 'retarded' as well as others of the such out of context. I wouldn't want to offend anyone.
 ______________________________
[Mar 23,2007 2:20pm - Lamp ""]
I wouldn't give half a fuck if you were being sarcastic using the word gay to describe something but whether you want to admit it or not, I don't think you are. I think you're seriously trying to make people feel worse about themselves by letting them know they're gay, and a couple other people already owned your ass up and down in this thread already so I guess I can just sit here and laugh knowing there's nothing you can do about it.
 _______________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 3:20pm - kessaris nli  ""]
you know, we have the right to revolution if we feel the government has failed us. Just saying
 ______________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 4:28pm - hungtableed  ""]
Lamp said:I wouldn't give half a fuck if you were being sarcastic using the word gay to describe something but whether you want to admit it or not, I don't think you are. I think you're seriously trying to make people feel worse about themselves by letting them know they're gay, and a couple other people already owned your ass up and down in this thread already so I guess I can just sit here and laugh knowing there's nothing you can do about it.


Who's the homo that I made feel worse about being gay? Hell, from what I'm gathering gay is something to proud of? Aren't you supposed to celebrate diversity? I smell a Fascistic/Communistic leaning here from this whole "having to do something about" how I view homos. If I don't agree with you all then I must be fucked up and I need some sort of re-education in sensitivity. I never even said I hated queers, I just said that I think - read that again - I think boys who bang other boys butts is wrong- and I stand by that regardless whether or not you think I was "owned up and down this thread".
 _____________________________
[Mar 23,2007 4:30pm - pam ""]
This thread sucks.
 ______________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 4:33pm - hungtableed  ""]
blame the pc police who have already missed at least one a "gay" (or maybe it was "fag") remark today alone without stirring up a little nancy fit over a negative reference to queers. I guess I'm special and should be held to a higher standard.
 _____________________________
[Mar 23,2007 4:35pm - pam ""]
Aren't you one of those "I don't agree with homosexuality" dudes? I think that paints the target on you over others who call things gay.
 _____________________________
[Mar 23,2007 4:36pm - pam ""]
And I'm not defending anyone, just saying I think that was an easy attack angle for people with opposing political opinions on this board.
 ______________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 4:39pm - hungtableed  ""]
http://www.returntothepit.com/view.php?formid=39758

What about 'Mess' here - he said he hated fags. I've never even gone that far. I don't hate fags, I just don't agree with what they do.
 ______________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 4:40pm - hungtableed  ""]
I'm sorry, he didn't say he hated, he said he "don't like fags" - still, I didn't go that far.
 _____________________________
[Mar 23,2007 4:49pm - pam ""]
I think it's just a matter of you posting more often, someone sees an angle to take with you, they're going to take it.

I don't agree with most of what you say, I'd still have a beer with you.

I don't think you should be getting nailed to the cross for using a term EVERYONE on this board uses, but I see why they'd pursue the angle. War dissent often gets the rebuke of "gay", "pussy", "pinko/liberal", "crybaby", etc. Which is dumb because disagreeing with the war doesn't make you gay or anti-American.

Unless you're HTL. ;)
 _____________________________
[Mar 23,2007 4:51pm - pam ""]
The original point before this retarded thread took off was that making a remark about "gay" following government dissent is common and annoying to people that hear it all the time.
 ______________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 4:57pm - hungtableed  ""]
pam said:The original point before this retarded thread took off was that making a remark about "gay" following government dissent is common and annoying to people that hear it all the time.


Point taken. I guess I could have said:
"Fuck, the femininity is almost rubbing off...." and had the same effect. I only would feel bad about using gay where I did if mOe was gay. If he were, I wouldn't have said "the gayness is almost rubbing off". I might be an insensitive prick, but I wouldn't go as far as verbally assaulting someone who is gay no matter how I much I disagree with what they do. The only exception is this gay kid who grew up on my street, we all make fun of him and he thinks its funny because he has a sense of humor and knows we don't hate him for who he is.
 _____________________________
[Mar 23,2007 5:18pm - pam ""]
I call all my gay friends fags. They are, they know it. It's all in the context I guess!
 ____________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 5:31pm - RichHorror ""]
So, how about that Hee-Haw, eh? That was a pretty good show, right?
 ___________________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 5:42pm - FuckIsMySignature ""]
relating to the origin of the thread...


My buddy claims he just saw a Hummer with tinted windows and a Blackwater logo (complete with bearclaw) on the back window rollin through Auburn. Bad news?
 ______________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 5:45pm - hungtableed  ""]
FuckIsMySignature said:relating to the origin of the thread...


My buddy claims he just saw a Hummer with tinted windows and a Blackwater logo (complete with bearclaw) on the back window rollin through Auburn. Bad news?



Dude, Blackwater is only like 220K+/- I'd believe the idea of them having presence in Auburn (of all places) when I see it. If they were, then it's probably not that good of news. Either they are preparing to lock down our streets or there is some super top secret shit going down. If it were the latter, I'd hope they wouldn't roll around with their ad on the back window.
 ___________________________________________
[Mar 23,2007 6:00pm - FuckIsMySignature ""]
yeah thats what i was thinking... but he said the logo looked identical to that of the one on the video. Jack Bauer where are you?!
 _________________________________________
[Mar 24,2007 4:44am - ctb0rderpatrol  ""]
hungtableed said:ZJD said:hungtableed said: What I said is that I, personally, think it is wrong and un-natural. I never even said that they weren't human, I just think what they do is un-natural and wrong.


I'll reiterate; how did you come to this conclusion?



Because asses are for shitting out of - not so dudes who have a twisted perversion have a hole to put their dick in.




so after 8 years you havent slipped it into your womans pooper?

pshhh that ones goin nowhere:tightiewhities:
 _________________________________
[Mar 24,2007 5:10am - sxealex ""]
powerkok said:(thats the guard when you make a noise)


in the japense one the say "TA-DAN-KA-DU-GA!"

 __________________________________________
[Mar 24,2007 9:28am - davefromthegrave ""]
GoatOfCatalyst said:I would like to take this opportunity to wish smokin hot bisexual daughters on ALL of you... So I can abscond with them to mine grand seraglio and ravish them like a deranged sultan when I am 46 and creepy and they are 18.


Ryan at 46

[img]
 _______________________________________
[Mar 24,2007 10:08am - GoatCatalyst ""]
i love you dave (no homo)
 ______________________________________
[Mar 24,2007 1:09pm - the_reverend ""]
he says that until he gets the crunk on. then he busts open his homo ass.

I haven't read most of this thread and haven'twatch the video so I have an opinion that matters. if we had a shadow army, why not just kill people around the world? assassinations!
 ______________________________________
[Mar 24,2007 1:24pm - hungtableed  ""]
the_reverend said:

if we had a shadow army, why not just kill people around the world? assassinations!



:doublehorns:
 ____________________________________________________
[Mar 25,2007 7:12am - super happy funtime harry  ""]
i love watching bitches make out, fuck any faggot who doesn't.

jesus wanted us to watch hot females make out and touch eachother in naughty no no type places and ways.

rootbeer floats from wendy's are not good.

jump pages:[all|1|2]


Reply
[login ]
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
message

top [Vers. 0.12][ 0.008 secs/8 queries][refresh][