.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Murph.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Murph:592678"]hungtableed said:[QUOTE]Murph said:[QUOTE] Actually, my friend, you equated homosexuality with pedophilia, and since pedophilia is a crime, you purported homosexuality to be a crime or on the same level on a crime. That would be saying they should be denied or persecuted for that particular choice, and that is disregard for someone's basic human and in this country, American right. I honor free speech as much as anyone. But I hold people to actual remember and understand what the fuck they say. [/QUOTE] I didn't [I]equate[/I] them. It's called a simile. You obviously lack reading comprehension skills. I said that fags are just perverts who get off by fucking people of the same sex. Just [I]like[/I] (refer to [URL]http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=simile[/URL] ) pedos who are perverts that get off by fucking/touching kids. I called them both perverts, I never equated boys fucking boys with old dudes touching kids. Besides, I'd estimate that 80% of pedophilia as being of the homosexual persuasion - I read the news and it's an all too common story I see often. [/QUOTE] I forgot how smart you are. Maybe you should look up the definition of pervert. A perversion is something not socially acceptable, i.e. something that is against what society deems OK. Therefore, pretty much against societal law. Therefore, young scholar, you equated them as both being outside of social acceptance. It's called a conditional statement, where you do not equate two things on their individual merit, but in the way they are viewed against each other, within the same criterion. And your estimate, of 80% is not even close. And if I was not able to understand simile, then you also misuse the word like, as LIKE is used to compare two things in a SIMILAR fashion, hence SIMILE. First you say you did not equate the two, then used a self-purported figure to assert their similarity, but still maintain you were not placing homosexuality and pedophilia as like "perversions." You just might be an idiot wrapped in a moron.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.007 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][