.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to demondave.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="demondave:1051603"][QUOTE="Yeti:812584"][QUOTE="samYam:812582"]�Proof of actual innocence requires more than his exclusion as the source of a handful of biological material that is not dispositive of the identity of a killer,� the judge wrote.[/QUOTE] uh, what? i'd call DNA pretty solid evidence.[/QUOTE] I don't know the full case, but from what was posted above it seems that there is not DNA evidence. It sounds like they are saying that since there is no DNA evidence tying them directly, they can not be held as guilty. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.008 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][