.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ShadowSD.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ShadowSD:423730"]What's striking here is how Sully wants to sound all middle of the road and distance himself from embracing goverment positions in 2003 when it was the popular position: Interviewer: I GOT YOU ON TAPE SAYING THEYRE PROTECTING US BY ATTACKING, BY GOING OVER THERE AND TAKING OUT PEOPLE. Sully: Listen, dont fuckin turn my words around to make it to what you want it to be! Thats not what I meant and you know that. If Sully supported pre-emptive strikes, and it's on tape, why doesn't he just fess up to it? Regardless of how you feel politically, the hypocrisy here is insulting. What Sully said was popular in 2003, but is a minority viewpoint now, so he wants to pretend he never felt that way and erase it from history; he's not a politician, but he's acting like one. The one defense to make this interviewer look completely out of line is "hey I'm just a musician, I'm not trying to make political statements", and it totally falls apart when he's afraid to back up his own words because they're not popular anymore. If Sully still backed up pre-emptive strikes, I could respect his viewpoint. If he no longer believes in attacking first, but admits that he used to believe in it and has since learned otherwise, I could respect that, too. But after preaching and financially benefiting from what was popular in 2003, and pretending it never happened when it became unpopular in 2006, I think as much of the man's mind as I do of his musical talent. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][