.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Christina.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Christina:351975"]Josh_Martin said:[QUOTE]Christina said:[QUOTE] It is a fact not an accusation that the ACLU wants to legalize child pornography. [/QUOTE] Could you post a link or something to support that statement please? [/QUOTE] Read up on this case that the ACLU lost: [URL]New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747.[/URL] “The ACLU's position is this: criminalize the production [U]but legalize the sale and distribution of child pornography.[/U] This is the kind of lawyerly distinction that no one on the Supreme Court found convincing. And with good reason: as long as a free market in child pornography exists, there will always be some producers willing to risk prosecution. Beyond this, there is also the matter of how the sale of child pornography relates either to free speech or the ends of good government. But most important, the central issue is whether a free society should legalize transactions that involve the wholesale sexploitation of children for profit. The ACLU objects to the idea that porn movie producers be required to maintain records of ages of its performers; this would be “a gross violation of privacy." [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][