.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to susurrate.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="susurrate:1415595"]if it becomes legal, your proposed concept would be claimed unconstitutional/unfair by someone on the left and get overturned before it even takes effect i would guess. personally, i wouldn't have a problem with people smoking weed and collecting aid. much like i don't care if people are collecting aid and have a beer. however, if your concern is about people milking the system by spending what they're given on things like lottery, drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol instead of shit they're supposed to use it on, yeah that's a concern. but if they decide to grow a couple of their own plants for personal consumption instead of spending money on it, it won't affect the fiscal side of things any more than it already does. I AM in favor of having recipients tested for "real drugs" that are a detriment to our society at large such as crack cocaine, methamphetamine, and un-prescribed opiates (heroin and all that shit obviously falls into this category as well) - i simply put marijuana in its raw state well below alcohol in terms of danger/ability to change someone/ability to abuse. as far as where it should be smoked, people now have the option of using vaporizers which burn clean, look like e-cigs, but don't produce huge clouds like e-cigarettes. you can barely see the vapor. and the smell of the vapor is barely detectable upon a persons exhale. it dissipates within about 10 seconds and if you're more than 6 feet away, you'll never smell it. my source on that is having many friends who are constantly using weed that i spend time around. that's the solution for places like apartments or condos that you're concerned about. i'm voting yes because i've looked into the issue pretty heavily. i'm also voting no on question 2 because it's bullshit for city/town public school education budgets. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.010 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][