.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to xmikex.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="xmikex:102074"]to really understand considerable portions of the video you really need to have been a part of the hardcore scene in boston over the last few years, at least in my opinion. I think alot of people who weren't are being left in the dark about some things. Should it be like that, or is that a production flaw? I'd like to see more people dicussing it as a documentary that it is (or is at least advertised as), rather than a peice of consumption junction footage. I think the video is still having problems breaking away from the girls-gone-wild-ish tendencies of volume I. It tends to rely too heavily on montages of things that look cool, rather than constructing a narrative. Wether you appreciate hardcore or not there's quite an interesting story to be told. The interviews with Nathan, and Baldwin, etc. are excellent, and tell a side of hardcore that most people don't know. It brings the video to the verge of making some really interesting points, but everything in between is just way too thin. Example: As much as I like seeing Dave Suture hit that kid it loses it's significance really fast when I have to keep looking at it without anything to elaborate on it. I dunno, just my thoughts as a film theory/videography nerd. we'll see what happens in volume 3. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][