.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ShadowSD.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ShadowSD:1347182"]Same progression except the extra dwelling on the III chord on the first song, which actually gives it a completely different sappy happy feel, plus it also drags. To me the first song is painful, and the second one is pretty good; the verses in Creep try to take up less frequencies and have slightly less variance in the vocal melody while also have an extra clean guitar melody going, although the relative constancy of its patterns bind together the verse just like the vocals do, so it's a certain degree of less is more but mostly just better is better. Chord progressions can't be copyrighted. It's kind of like how so many of the best songs include a lot of usage of i and VI, but it's still possible for someone to find a way to fuck even a i-VI song up if they suck at writing enough. When it comes to Green Day and Chicago sharing the i VII IV VI V progression, it's the same thing of how nobody can own that; I'm surprised no one also argued that the Chicago song is actually a rip of Led Zepplin's Babe I'm Gonna Leave You, and no one replied that the Beatles' verses of Guitar Gently Weeps came first, and no one said back that the Anne Bredon original version of the Zepplin song actually came before that, and on and on and on.... [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][