.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Snowden.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Snowden:1326894"][QUOTE="my_dying_bride:1326795"]Though the number 47 seems high, you simply can't argue that there is a good portion of voters that will vote Obama solely cause they choose to be unemployed and have the government take care of them. There are many worthless hypocritical leeches in this country that don't understand how economies work, and why companies aren't hiring; they just get a check and hope it doesn't change. The Obama campaign aims to keep these voters by exploiting comments like Romney's. A comment like that shouldn't offend anyone who's seen the labor statistics.[/QUOTE] The thing about his remark isn't the actual number, it's that he came right out and said it "wasn't his job" to represent those people as president. Because (he incorrectly thought) that they didn't pay taxes and were unlikely to vote for him. The fact that he got the actual number wrong doesn't change the fact that this is an incredibly fucked-up way to look at the presidency. The fact that he was willing to write off almost half the country without even thinking "hm, it feels weird to totally dismiss 47% of the country I'm running for president of, maybe I should make sure I'm reading this tax info correctly?" is still pretty fucked-up as well though. Why would a sane person run for president if they actually believed that 47% of the population were pieces of shit? There are plenty of things I don't like about Obama, but he's definitely the lesser evil here.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][