attn: barktourus[views:7704][posts:26]____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 2:40pm - arilliusbm ""] http://scienceray.com/earth-sciences/scien...nd-underground-chamber-pumapunku-2/ Yea, yea, yea..not a mainstream source. Worth a look, though. Anything with Pumapunku makes my ears perk up. One of the strangest anomolies on earth. |
| ________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 2:42pm - Burnsy ""] Published four days ago... I'll let it slide. |
| ____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 2:46pm - trioxin245 ""] Burnsy said:FIRST Old news. |
| ________________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 2:47pm - DestroyYouAlot ""] DICK |
| ____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 2:49pm - arilliusbm ""] Uncalled for. Immature. |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 2:57pm - ark ""] "did ancient aliens build this??? will we find evidence???" WHY do they find it necessary to put that bullshit in an article. They paint it as a mystery so they can throw that question in there. It's not much of a mystery. Yes not much is known about ancient SA kings and specific cultures but it's not surprising at all they had the tech and manpower to use geometry and carve sandstone..just use harder stone. This place was a mecca and people's lives were devoted to it. People trekked from all over South America to here and the best minds on the continent worked their whole lives on it. Aliens had nothing to do with it and that site blows. Cool they're about to uncover a tomb, it won't contain "evidence of ancient alien intervention". Also I guarantee there is no archaeologist named Domingo Mendoza, usually they would have pictures of fieldwork and at least SAY WHO THE ARCHAEOLOGIST WORKS FOR, you usually get hits on Google right away for professor names and I can't find this guy. |
| ___________________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 2:59pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] original post |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:01pm - ark ""] if there was digging going on at pumapunku, i'm surprised i haven't seen any news about it on real archaeology sites, if there was a new dig going on it would be big news. |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:04pm - ark ""] http://www.archaeology.org/interactive/tiwanaku/index.html the last dig i can find ended in '05 |
| ____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:07pm - arilliusbm ""] Where did it say that? |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:08pm - ark ""] that it ended in '05? or that the scienceray site should drop science from it's name? |
| ____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:08pm - arilliusbm ""] and lol, just saw that now. I followed the link from facebook. No other research done on this "dig." |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:09pm - ark ""] sorry...*its...i don't want to wake the grammer nazzi |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:09pm - ark ""] oh. facebook. cool. |
| ____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:11pm - arilliusbm ""] Wait a second. pumapunku does not blow. It's one of most fascinating places in South America, next to the Nazca Lines and the mountain getaway Macho Pizza. |
| ____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:14pm - arilliusbm ""] So you think this whole article is BS (likely), PumaPunku is all figured out (not likely) and that aliens had nothing to do with it (very likely). I'm not familiar with this site at all, so I'm not sure of the credability. But after reading that at the bottom of the page, it's obvious it's one of "those" sites. |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:16pm - ark ""] hahaha. i meant website. the SITE is amazing. |
| ____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:16pm - arilliusbm ""] Ahhhhh. Okay. Bahha. |
| ____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:17pm - arilliusbm ""] The one big question I want to know about PP is WHY IS IT SHATTERED AND STREWN ABOUT? |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:18pm - ark ""] nah, not figured out, the story of pumapunku will never be "figured out" not even in the same league as ancient egytian and minoan sites because there are literally no sources. |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:19pm - ark ""] ruins picked and moved by random people. like how they used to encourage people to take stones from the Colosseum. |
| ____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:28pm - arilliusbm ""] Yea, but there is no other place on earth that's as spread out like PP. The stones weigh tons. They're all over the place. Personally, I think it's much older than we think. There are a few spots around the planet that are changing my thoughts on human history.. most recently Gobekli Tepe in Turkey. Current dates are estimated at 10,000-9,000 BC on that site. I may be going against the grain, but I'm convinced there were Antediluvian cities and cultures that were destroyed with the Ice Age and washed away in the following floods. All over the planet... |
| ____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:30pm - arilliusbm ""] As we've discussed before. |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:30pm - ark ""] can't deny that if modern humans were around for 100,000+ years and the oldest known firepits are 1,000,000 years old. even modern digging tech wouldn't do well finding pre ice age anything. gobekli tepe is my favorite. not even surprising to me. zoroastrianism was |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:31pm - ark ""] ...not even far away from that. |
| ____________________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:34pm - arilliusbm ""] Heh, regarding Gobekli Tepe.. Only 5% of it has been excavated. They estimate that it's even older than 11,000BC. Uruk and Ur what? gobekli is nearly twice as old as those sites. And they're finding more and more sites in Turkey that go underground. WHY AM I SITTING IN A CUBE |
| ______________________________ [Aug 17,2012 3:36pm - Yeti ""] we must prepare for the coming of Gozer. |