.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Headbanging Man.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Headbanging%20Man:1153258"][QUOTE="Slag:1153151"][URL]http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/why-im-posting-bail-money[/URL] This dude rules.[/QUOTE] I like Moore sometimes, and very much like what he has to say about supporting Wikileaks, but there's some serious retardation here: [QUOTE]I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo. That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001. Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks. But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes? But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he have called the FBI? (Please read this essay by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year, about her belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been prevented.)[/QUOTE] While it certainly is interesting to speculate about what effects a Coleen Rowley or John O'Neill might have had through a leak to the media, the best case scenario I can imagine is that they would expose a handful of the potential patsies. But if Moussaoui was an alleged "20th hijacker", it's hard not to imagine that there were other patsies already in the US and ready to step in if needed. Just as the co-conspirators could not legitimately expect the patsies to have the skills to fly into the selected targets (and thus resorted to ROV/UAV technology), so would it have been foolish to gamble such a crucial operation on the presence of 19 alleged jihadists, any of whom could have been arrested or deported before the operation commenced. But then, Michael Moore doesn't have the fortitude to challenge the Standard Democrat's 9/11 Myth that the executive branch merely was incompetent in the face of a terrorist threat. Unfortunately, Mike is an enabler. Great for him to buck Official Democrat Policy on the WL front, but at the end of the day, he'll be Judas-goating for Obama and the shitty right-wingers that rule his party as soon as the next national elections approach. It's a shame how many prominent "progressives" are willing to capitulate to lesser-of-two-evils thinking when push comes to shove.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.006 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][