.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Tardgasser 352.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Tardgasser%20352:1102024"][QUOTE="Bonomi:1101988"]Statistically it is likely that at some point in your life, one of your loved ones will probably succumb to a protracted debilitating illness. Towards the end, the loved one will become a disabled person - perhaps for a duration of many years.[/QUOTE] http://www.eugenics.net/ Killing the weak applies to congenital conditions. If someone gets a disease later in life, but it is not genetically determined, there's no evolutionary advantage to offing them. Also, your "statistically" likelihood is probably bullshit. Long-term health is also determined by genes, so it's not logical to say that just because 1/4 of the population runs into such problems that every family will. http://www.eugenics.net/ [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.113 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][