.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Conservationist.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Conservationist:1049381"][QUOTE="slar%20you%20morbid?:1049236"][QUOTE="Conservationist:1049091"]And the real crux of the article: [quote] Bailey also said that these preferences may stem from a desire to show superiority or elitism, which also has to do with IQ. In fact, aligning oneself with "unconventional" philosophies such as liberalism or atheism may be "ways to communicate to everyone that you're pretty smart," he said. [/quote] They're talking about the difference between 114s and 120s, not the 125+ zone.[/QUOTE] you left out the first part "The adoption of some evolutionarily novel ideas makes some sense in terms of moving the species forward," said George Washington University leadership professor James Bailey, who was not involved in the study. "It also makes perfect sense that more intelligent people -- people with, sort of, more intellectual firepower -- are likely to be the ones to do that."[/QUOTE] I didn't, actually -- they're guessing at reasons why, and both are options. The article does not definitively claim a link.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.007 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][