.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Dankill.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Dankill:975446"]WOW, did not see this coming and yet I can understand some angles of it. 1. This settles the Wilfork or Seymour debate on who to sign. With Seymour done and the capspace that frees up, Vince is gonna be the guy they make a new contract for. 2. Seymour is getting older, granted he's only gonna be 30. They must smell decline on him and figure they either got someone else they can trust with his position or someone else in their sights to trade for. 3. At least with trading him to Oakland, they send him to a team that can't hurt them and pretty much SUCKS while being run by one of the worst organizations in the NFL. If they keep sucking, in two years that could be a high first round pick. Use it or trade it, the Pats can turn that pick into something good in the long run. I'll be the first to admit this looks like a risky move, but the Pats never do something like this rashly. There has to be a plan behind it.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][