For Those Who Think Worcester is Shithole...[views:1974][posts:19]___________________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 12:10pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] you are still correct...however Forbes Magazine thinks we are the bee knees! #9 on Americas Most Livable Cities list. http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/01/cities-ci...ities_slide_11.html?thisSpeed=15000 |
_________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 12:22pm - reimroc ""] 2,334 crimes per 100,000 people not bad |
_________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 12:23pm - reimroc ""] portland, maine made number 1 |
______________________________ [Apr 7,2009 12:40pm - blue ""] In worcester, shithole is you! |
___________________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 12:47pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] still funny that Baltimore is more "livable" than worcester. |
______________________________ [Apr 7,2009 12:47pm - Yeti ""] only parts of Worcester are a shithole. my area was livable until the barbaric tree removal, now its dumpery is exposed and i hate it. i want to move back to the Institute area, it was actually pretty nice there. if you drive half a mile up Salisbury St. you are in an entirely different world. some areas have really been cleaned up, even Piedmont St. isn't a warzone anymore. WORCESTER!! |
____________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 12:49pm - RichHorror ""] Apparently that list was compiled by Tyrone Bigguns. [img] |
______________________________ [Apr 7,2009 12:50pm - Yeti ""] hahahahahahaha |
______________________________ [Apr 7,2009 12:51pm - Yeti ""] that's a really good picture, despite it being at the tail end of Lincoln St. which isn't all that nice. |
___________________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 12:53pm - FuckIsMySignature ""] i'm gonna need a fucking monster truck soon avoid the massive amounts of pot holes scattered through out the city. it may be livable but it certainly is not drivable. |
_________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 12:58pm - reimroc ""] i think people look at fitchburg and presume worcester is the same lolol |
________________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 7:07pm - SacreligionNLI ""] The only reason Worcester made the list is because Sacreligion is from there. |
___________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 7:31pm - porphyria ""] reimroc said:portland, maine made number 1 haha, funny, that's where I am now. |
_____________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 7:33pm - the_reverend ""] kings in a world of shit. congrats. |
________________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 7:40pm - SacreligionNLI ""] I'd rather be king in a world of shit than something lower than king in a world of shit. |
_____________________________________ [Apr 7,2009 8:07pm - the_reverend ""] either way you are covered in shit |
________________________________________ [Apr 8,2009 7:51am - metal_church101 ""] FuckIsMySignature said:...however Forbes Magazine thinks we are the bee knees! It's because Forbes Magazine knows about Sacreligion!!!!! |
_________________________________________ [Apr 8,2009 8:29am - largefreakatzero ""] Worcester even looks like a shithole in the photo they used for the article. Apparently they just couldn't get the right angle (ha). |
________________________________________ [Apr 8,2009 5:08pm - SacreligionNLI ""] the_reverend said:either way you are covered in shit Actually, I must be king, cuz i haven't got shit all over me. |
_____________________________ [Apr 9,2009 9:35am - Lamp ""] FuckIsMySignature said:still funny that Baltimore is more "livable" than worcester. I'd live in Baltimore, if only for the music scene. |