.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to grizloch.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="grizloch:877096"][Feb 2,2009 1:33pm - ouchdrummer] the only real downside i could see from so many bands was that the money got split a lot of ways... but if you had this many again you could always do the "Who are you here to see" thing. And if bands don't bring people: 1.they get paid less 2.they won't get to play again that way "half-ass" bands can't "whore" themselves out and nor promote. I've heard people try this in Albany, it usually ends up with the promoter back pedaling so that any bands will do shows with him again, truth is almost no one (at least here) will go to a show without there being at least 2 or 3 bands they want to see, like me for instance, as far as I'm concerned there wasn't a band that played that I didn't want to see, and I'm sure that many other people there were in the same boat but as has already been said, money shouldn't be an issue, I think the major argument is length of the show and people getting bored, but with all of the ludicrousness of the last one I don't think that was an issue to most people, but I could definitely see where at certain shows it could be I think the show was awesome, I think the venue was awesome (how many venues would put up with the utter decimation of computer accessories?), more shows should happen there, as many bands as are necessary should play, more shenanigans are always appreciated I say naked pudding wrestling and an eazy cheeze eat off, DO IT YOU WONT[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][