.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Murph.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Murph:1023017"][QUOTE="patmeebles:1023011"][QUOTE="matpeebles:1023007"]Pro-telling-people-what they-can-and-cannot-do-with-their-own-bodies? You lose! Good day, sir! That fiscal conservativism has to be held in conjunction with wacked out religious beliefs is the deal breaker. [/QUOTE] For you, sure. But there's nothing about the two that would exclude each other. Many republicans support drug legalization. And many more conservative women are pro-life. I think Conservationist is right on, if you look at it coming from a liberal perspective, you'll never get it. I had to explain very slowly to my sister that it's very possible to be conservative libertarian and pro-life, in that if you believe an unborn fetus is a life then it deserves the same basic constitutional protections that everyone else has. On that note, people should really stop assuming that every republican is Pat Robertson, just like I don't assume that every democrat is Bernie Sanders.[/QUOTE] pat, you're a reasonable fellow with political ideals not far from mine, but I would ask if you mis-typed...did you mean "pro-choice?"[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][