.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to darkwor.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="darkwor:836006"][QUOTE="pam%20@%20school:835990"][QUOTE="darkwor:835943"] i'm saying making something illegal doesn't stop it from happening, it just becomes unregulated. that's what dog racing will become, and it will end up being far worse for the dogs. [/QUOTE] That's a really, really good point that I hadn't thought of. [/QUOTE] i don't think there's any legislation that will stop the poor treatment of animals. keep it legal, funded, regulated and inspected. for question #1, who the hell cares about traffic cops, a YES vote will destroy public education from day cares to state colleges and universities. i work at worcester state and the budget is already spread so thin that there's a hiring freeze in effect for the forseeable future, we can't replace employees that leave, and have to take on extra responsibilies with no job title change or pay increase. and, public services (read: COPS) and not only will schools have less books than they do now, we'll have more pissed off cops that are spread thin because of cut funding just so we can pay a little bit less taxes which we won't notice the difference anyway. question 2 we all know the answer to :)[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.011 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][