.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Conservationist.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Conservationist:835297"][QUOTE="thuringwethil:835163"]Perhaps we should all take an IQ test before being allowed to vote but I guess what I like about Obama's plan (and liberals in general) is that they pay SOME attention to the concerns of the unspoken for[/QUOTE] I'm down with the IQ test. I guess my group of concern is normal middle-class Americans, who seem to be unrepresented because they're not dramatic. As I've seen it in life, focusing on the "unspoken for" decreases focus on job #1: promoting the good, ignoring the bad. I don't agree with The Rev at all -- most of the people I know making over $250,000 did it by a combination of having brains, having aggressive drive, and luck -- but you make you own luck, and that's why many of them didn't hit the right formula/mode until the appropriate time. I know that, especially in tech, this isn't always true -- I worked for one dude making $250,000 who had no qualification except that he got his MBA. However, his family started out dirt poor and he was proud of that fact. I have worked for people who got into that bracket by being from a protected group, because it surely wasn't for their competence. But others really deserve it -- they made smart moves and worked hard at them, taking more risks than anyone with a job can understand. I respect that. I'd also like them to have more importance in leadership than the homeless, criminal, drug-addled (except Mess), etc.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][