.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Murph.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Murph:821010"]McCain's a douche who jocked the fact he was bringing people behind this bailout bill into a huge surge for his campaign, getting it drafted, and then it it bombed in its passing by his own Party. Way to go pal. Obama sucks even harder, because he pretty much influenced this entire deal, well, not at all. Perhaps he knows the thing is fucked anyways, but he's still playing the sidelines, so he can look decent no matter what. But Gingrich believes that the mark-to-market bill (which in a nutshell looks at the anomalies in a certain market and then sets the price based upon those extreme lows or overages so as to make room for the rapid falling or rising of stock...which has led to gross over- and undervalues and wasted money..."which Bernanke and Paulsen alluded to when they said they would pay 2-3 times the set amount for paper because of how UNDERVALUED it is" - Gingrich) should be rescinded, and he estimates (based on much recent conferences with various economists) that this could alleviate up to $500 billion of the $700 billion asked for by the bill. Just saying, I am all about this plan. If it works, leave it nullified. If it tanks, then reinstate it and try to draft another bill. In any case, Gingrich is the only person I've heard on any news station (Olbermann has spent his entire show dissing McCain and occasionally poking at Obama, because he and his guests have no fucking clue what to do) actually present an idea, an idea which is also fundamentally sound. Ideas? Input?[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][