.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Murph.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Murph:807691"][QUOTE="Conservationist:807687"][QUOTE="Murph:807651"]Really, it doesn't matter much to me, but if you're about to tote policies that enforce a "Christian" sense of lifestyle, having your unwed teenage daughter be pregnant is not exactly the best PR. [/QUOTE] This policy of yours rewards those who have the lowest standards, doesn't it?[/QUOTE] No policy of mine. In fact, I was glossing the fact that to most streamlined Christians, having a candidate they relate to whose somewhat young, wholly unmarried daughter is pregnant might not be the best PR. Who knows, Palin might end up being an amazing VP should she win, and perhaps even a competent and definitely a historic and aesthetic President should McCain succumb to the grave. I just think it's a tough game, and for someone who was so recently nominated it is perhaps not the best news/publicity. You and your perception of 'low standards.' Your introspection must be quite limiting. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][