.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to xmikex.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="xmikex:781156"]I don't see how anyone could like the life aquatic over Tennenbaums or Rushmore. Don't get me wrong, I liked the life aquatic, but it was so scattered all over the place that it didn't hold my interest like his previous films did. I think that's part of the reason why he did Darjeeling. He was able to use the train as a way to keep the story tethered to it. The symbolism with the baggage in Darjeeling was a little obvious though. About half way through the movie I said to myself "This film won't end until there's a slow motion scene where they purposely ditch the baggage." Fast forward an hour and there it is. His symbolism was a lot more subtle in the first two films. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][