.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ConquerTheBaphomet.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ConquerTheBaphomet:778790"][QUOTE="Murph%20nli:778787"][QUOTE="ConquerTheBaphomet:778778"][QUOTE="Murph%20nli:778723"]My other question is why, from a faith-perspective, anyone would need to write a book making a case for scripture to be historical? Faith and truth are binaries, unless following that wonderful mantra of "The Word is the truth." If faith isn't enough anymore (because the lay people are finally opening a fucking book) that might just tell you something.[/QUOTE] Apologetics. [/QUOTE] Apologetics defends Christianity. Christianity pretty much invalidates the majority of Old Testament covenant, so why even bother with those stories? [/QUOTE] Christianity includes the Old Testament. While Jesus fulfills the majority of the Old Testament that's not a reason to ignore it. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][