.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to Swollen Donkey.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="Swollen%20Donkey:696405"]horror_tang said:[QUOTE]Swollen Donkey said:[QUOTE]horror_tang said:[QUOTE]This is not a joke. Allowing the government to dictate whether or not we can drink and drive is an infringement on our civil liberties. "But it's for or own good." Well, now you have to wear a seatbelt. Yes, statistically there has been shown to be a 50% intoxicant related causal rate of motor vehicle accident deaths (notice I did not say alcohol related). That means 50% are from sober drivers. When a driver dies in a car accident and alcohol and drugs are found in their system, it is reported as a drunk driving fatality. Was it the drugs or the alcohol? Who compiled the statistics? The truth is that the leading cause of motor vehicle accident deaths is driver distraction. Talking on a cell phone or eating breakfast on the way to work while driving is more likely to cause a motor vehicle fatality than someone driving drunk. The true number of deaths caused by drunk drivers is more comparable to deaths caused by drivers that fall asleep behind the wheel.[/QUOTE] your a fucking moron! Infringmens on our civil liberties? dude it's a law! Just shut up, no ones gonna buy this shit! [/QUOTE] What? I cannot hear anonymous faggots.[/QUOTE] That's too bad, you could learn something, you bafoon. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][