.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to haysuzer.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="haysuzer:672039"]thegreatspaldino wrote: "the breakdowns. it doesnt mean i would like them if they had breakdowns, its just that i could chalk their shittiness up to being a bandwagon band" Does this mean them having breakdowns makes them a band that would be "up to par" with other acts of today? If so, id have to strongly disagree. Kind of cliche to say actually. Kind of makes you the "hipster fag" you speak of saying a band has to have break downs to even be up to the same standards of other bands. Im not putting down the bands who do have them or some sort of them.. i enjoy it to an extent, its just to repetative. As is very tech music... but then again all music is repetative today, most mosic does suck today, and so does most peoples opinions on music because everyone thinks they are in a possision to judge music like they have the thought that others will care what they think? ...if that is what you meant in the first place. If not, you still sound very much like a tool. Congrats. Thank you for voicing your opinion on music and thank you for allowing me to pick you out of all of these posts here today. Sorry for mussing up this page even more with comments that dont have anythgint o do with this news post. Congrats to BG for getting signed, whether you suck or not... you made it there. Props.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.006 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][