.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
|
3
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to grizloch.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="grizloch:668346"]ArrowHead likes Pie said:[QUOTE]grizloch said:[QUOTE]ugh, the kid wasnt tased for asking a question, he was tased for being an idiot[/QUOTE] He was tazered for resisting arrest. Something that should be considered unnecessary considering there were already 4-5 cops on him. It was a display of power, not a needed use of force to detain a suspect. If 4 cops can't kneel on one teenager and put him in cuffs with ease, then they shouldn't be working as cops. [/QUOTE] there is a difference between restraining someone without hurting them and breaking their legs, I dunno if youve ever had to restrain someone who was fighting back, but doing it without hurting them or getting hurt is harder than you seem to think, particularly when you have a gun and the kid has absolutely no intention of going quietly, if the kid had gotten an arm broken and the cops got kicked in the balls and there was blood and hair everywhere this would have been a much bigger spectacle on a national scale, not to mention in that room, he was tazed to stop him from struggling and getting hurt or hurting someone else, regardless of how many cops there were, thats what tazers are for if thats not what tazers are for, feel free to clue me in[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][