.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ArrowHead likes Pie.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ArrowHead%20likes%20Pie:660580"]dreadkill said:[QUOTE] i hate when people say a show or movie sucks because they read the book.[/QUOTE] It's not even close to that. The parts of the plot in season one that were taken directly from the books was interesting, even if they drew it out to fill an entire season. However, to fill it out, they added a lot of shit to it themselves, and the stuff they added was all campy, retarded crap that didn't really fit the overall atmosphere. Not only that, but if they repeat the same formula and use book 2 as a template for the second season, they've already screwed a couple major points which means that the second season would need to contain even MORE original material. As I said, the original stuff for the most part sucked. I loved the books, and seeing them acted out was cool. But the terrible acting (except the guy who plays dexter) and the goofy shit they added ruined it. Also, they totally tone down all the scenes of dexter with his victims, and cut a lot out. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][