.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ShadowSD.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ShadowSD:429649"]I know, I was referring to the difference between the two. If there IS a warrant to tap the phone, it has nothing to do with the current NSA story, so why would the agent risk violating a warrant by tipping them off? On the other hand, if there is NO warrant to tap the phone, then the whistleblowing is both relevant to the current wiretapping controversy and less of a risk for the agent doing it in terms of being prosecuted. Therefore, given the two options, it is more likely that there was no warrant here. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][