.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to ShadowSD.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="ShadowSD:425488"]Pat Meebles nli said:[QUOTE][url]http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/012631.php[/url] [/QUOTE] None of this addresses one basic problem. The FISA laws that were created in the late 1970's were meant to prevent the executive branch from violating the Constitution's fourth amendment. So even if we are to believe that courts judged that 72 hour waiting period unconstitutional because it meant the FISA court was encroaching on Presidential authority, it still not does do away with the issues concerning why that original law was created in the first place: to prevent the executive branch from violating the fourth amendment. It is a basic legal principle (and basic logic) that if any law protecting the constitution is later deemed unconstitutional, that the original consitutional question that inspired that law is not settled and tucked away, but rather remains unresolved. [/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.005 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][