.:.:.:.:RTTP.Mobile:.:.:.:.
[<--back] [Home][Pics][News][Ads][Events][Forum][Band][Search]
full forum | bottom

---

Reply
[login ]
SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to wade.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="wade:419121"]davefromthegrave said:[QUOTE]I think that digital works out to be more economical than analog, especially if you're taking a lot of photos. Although the cameras are pretty expensive, you don't have to buy film or pay for development afterwards. Of course, you're right that there's a difference, and you just can't put a price on art. [/QUOTE] shit yeah, money-wise, digital cannot be touched. If I had a film scanner, I'd be in much better shape. but I want a really good one so that's a ways away. [/QUOTE]

top [Vers. 0.12][ 0.003 secs/8 queries][refresh][