.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
jump pages:[
all
|
1
|
2
]
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to BestialOnslaught.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="BestialOnslaught:336931"]Josh_Martin said:[QUOTE]Pat Meebles nli said:[QUOTE]Damnit, I forgot my name again. And on the issue of lying through his teeth about WMD's, I could also go on and on and on and on and on proving thathe didn't lie, but I'm not going to write a novel either. [/QUOTE] I think I'll believe professional weapons inspectors before some kid on the RTTP board.[/QUOTE] I know, right? If you can go on and on to prove that Iraq was full of WMDs, go right ahead! The fact is that the failure to turn up WMDs DOES prove that, even if Saddam did have some WMDs, the administration exaggerated and blatantly lied in their claims that they knew exactly where to find the WMDs. It's not like they said "We think there are WMDs are and we're going to find them even if it takes us a few years." Their claim was more along the lines of "We know they have WMDs and exactly where we are, and as soon as the formality of a short military operation is complete, we will have our hands on all these materials."[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.004 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][