.:.:.:.:
RTTP
.
Mobile
:.:.:.:.
[
<--back
] [
Home
][
Pics
][
News
][
Ads
][
Events
][
Forum
][
Band
][
Search
]
full forum
|
bottom
Reply
[
login
]
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
you are quoting a heck of a lot there.
[QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to dread_104.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
message
[QUOTE="dread_104:234725"]Upon Review of the governing laws and regulations, the evidence presented, and in consideration of the basis of the appellant's appeal, it is the determination of the Hearing Officer that the appellant did demonstrate a showing necessary to rebut the governing presumption of the applicable standard of fault. The Hearing Officer therefore finds: (i) the appellant IS NOT more than 50% at fault for the accident; and, (ii) the surcharge IS NOT in accordance with the Standards of Fault promulgated by the Board and the provisions of the Safe Driver Insurance Plan established by the Commissioner of Insurance. The Board hereby orders the surcharge be VACATED and orders the insurer to delete the related SDIP surcharge points from the appellant's premium. Fuck tha Police.[/QUOTE]
top
[
Vers. 0.12
][ 0.008 secs/8 queries][
refresh
][