News Article: pentagon 911 video released[views:15219][posts:85]______________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:02pm - the_reverend ""] http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/16/pentagon.video/index.html I heard it was starting tom arnold. |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:06pm - the_reverend ""] http://www.judicialwatch.org/ released at 1pm. |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:08pm - the_reverend ""] http://www.judicialwatch.org/5772.shtml their site is slashdot'd |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:19pm - the_reverend ""] not up yet. some one find it. now! |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:21pm - hungtableed ""] I knew it. I knew it wasn't a plane, it was a missle that was launched from air force one...with Bush...and Cheney on board. |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:25pm - the_reverend ""] bush and cheney were on it? no shit. I'm going to have to tell people that. I was telling them that tom arnold was riding it and a co-worker said arnold swarz-whatever fired it from the plane in true lies. |
| ____________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:31pm - anonymous ""] You guys have watched "Loose Change" way too many times |
| ____________________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:31pm - Man_of_the_Century ""] You people are fools, it was the evil corperations that did it. |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:33pm - hungtableed ""] the_reverend said:bush and cheney were on it? no shit. I'm going to have to tell people that. I was telling them that tom arnold was riding it and a co-worker said arnold swarz-whatever fired it from the plane in true lies. true lies? I heard it was the plane from Last Action Hero |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:40pm - the_reverend ""] no way! the one from true lies was infused with dinosaur DNA from the blood in a mosquito trapped in amber. |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:50pm - the_reverend ""] http://www.judicialwatch.org/ slashdotted to hell |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:52pm - the_reverend ""] they could have done a better job... http://youtube.com/watch?v=l_VoznREBgY&search=pentagon%20crash |
| ______________________________________________ [May 16,2006 1:57pm - BobNOMAAMRooney nli ""] No no no, the missile was in reality an x-ray beam fired by a Zionist controlled telecommunications satellite helmed by Rupert Murdoch and Madonna. |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 2:01pm - the_reverend ""] dasterly. I wish destro was real. |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 2:26pm - the_reverend ""] I guess they were on fox news and sucked. |
| ____________________________________ [May 16,2006 2:31pm - BornSoVile ""] what cheap video, you can't even see the plane still. |
| ______________________________ [May 16,2006 3:11pm - Yeti ""] that video doesnt prove or disprove anything. |
| _______________________________________ [May 16,2006 3:37pm - watchmaker666 ""] why doesnt any of the links posted work! |
| ____________________________________ [May 16,2006 4:38pm - handinjury ""] BornSoVile said:what cheap video, you can't even see the plane still. Zackelys. Its fucking lame. Every time I see the footage of the pentagon, I say "wheres the plane?", "wheres the fucking wings?" if it was a plane, then the building should have a much bigger hole width wise becasue of the plans wings. And how does a plane get that close to the ground to hit the front of the building and not the top of the building. It was either a van or a missle that hit the pentagon. I think its really fucking week that our government knew all about this shit that day, but felt they had to fluff up the terrorism scandel. Very conveinent that the "plane" hit a unoccipied area of the pentagon. Wheres Dwyer, I need my spelling corrected. |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 4:40pm - the_reverend ""] weak. |
| ____________________________________________ [May 16,2006 4:49pm - Man_of_the_Century ""] handinjury said:Zackelys. Its fucking lame. Every time I see the footage of the pentagon, I say "wheres the plane?", "wheres the fucking wings?" if it was a plane, then the building should have a much bigger hole width wise becasue of the plans wings. And how does a plane get that close to the ground to hit the front of the building and not the top of the building. It was either a van or a missle that hit the pentagon. I think its really fucking week that our government knew all about this shit that day, but felt they had to fluff up the terrorism scandel. Very conveinent that the "plane" hit a unoccipied area of the pentagon. Take a Physics class and then talk. |
| ____________________________________ [May 16,2006 5:03pm - BornSoVile ""] Man_of_the_Century said: Take a Physics class and then talk. Wait a second, you're the expert here, you talk, you answer those questions. |
| ______________________________________ [May 16,2006 5:32pm - weymouthdoug ""] handinjury said:BornSoVile said:what cheap video, you can't even see the plane still. Zackelys. Its fucking lame. Every time I see the footage of the pentagon, I say "wheres the plane?", "wheres the fucking wings?" if it was a plane, then the building should have a much bigger hole width wise becasue of the plans wings. And how does a plane get that close to the ground to hit the front of the building and not the top of the building. It was either a van or a missle that hit the pentagon. I think its really fucking week that our government knew all about this shit that day, but felt they had to fluff up the terrorism scandel. Very conveinent that the "plane" hit a unoccipied area of the pentagon. Wheres Dwyer, I need my spelling corrected. the wings would get sheered off hittting a building dumbass, the hole wouldn't be in the shape of a plane sillouette like in a Bugs Bunny cartoon. |
| _______________________________ [May 16,2006 5:48pm - eddie ""] does anyone really, honestly care how the hole got there? do you not know the government lies all the time? why should that be a shock? blah blah blah 1. a plane went through it because of terrorists 2.A a plane was shot down by the usa because of terrorists 2.B government lied about plane going through building and shot the pentagon i don't really understand the motivation of the 2nd scenario, and i don't like being lied too. Doesn't change the fact that the event sucked greatly either way. Did america make the event worse if they indeed lied about something like that? i dunno i'd need to know the reason why they did that, which i don't think i'll ever know. |
| _______________________________ [May 16,2006 5:49pm - eddie ""] if it indeed happened |
| __________________________________________ [May 16,2006 5:56pm - dwellingsickness ""] I have an aunt and uncle that work at the pentagon, Even they won't talk about it . |
| _____________________________________ [May 16,2006 10:16pm - Govt Mule ""] im unsure if I've seen the "new" video yet. is it basically the same as the 1st "leaked" video? |
| ________________________________________ [May 16,2006 11:36pm - midgetstealer ""] I just saw it on the news while I was flipping the channels, You can't see anything even it being slowed down to basically a pause. From where the back fin on the airplane is before it hits looks like it wouldve been crashed well before the pentagon. I've never flown a plane though so im not really sure if you can fly one of those 10ft from the ground. |
| _____________________________________ [May 16,2006 11:44pm - Govt Mule ""] [img] This is undeniable evidence... |
| __________________________________________ [May 16,2006 11:51pm - Affenschwanz ""] The Koran now comes in two ply |
| ________________________________ [May 17,2006 1:05am - retzam ""] Watching the second video, if you have any sense of perspective, you can see that the object is not as big as a plane. The first video you can't see anything at all. |
| ______________________________________ [May 17,2006 1:52am - KINGDIAMOND ""] Katrina was caused by giant fans in the ocean. |
| _____________________________________ [May 17,2006 2:09am - Sacreligion ""] are we really supposed to believe that? the 3 minute video of the security camera barely shows anything...and if you pause it at the right time what is supposed to be the plane(easily CGI) it's more the size of a private jet the second video is the fakest thing i've ever seen |
| __________________________________ [May 17,2006 10:13am - soloman ""] Don't be conspiracy nerds. At least consider for a moment that the boeing trully hit the pentagon. This is a good read: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1 |
| _______________________________________ [May 17,2006 10:22am - the_reverend ""] http://www.judicialwatch.org/flight77.shtml |
| __________________________________________ [May 17,2006 10:37am - SacreligionNLI ""] soloman said:Don't be conspiracy nerds. At least consider for a moment that the boeing trully hit the pentagon. This is a good read: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1 that doesn't explain why there was no debris, how all the cars WEREN'T blown away like pieces of confetti as the massive jet passed 25 ft. overhead, it didn't mention any contradictory eyewitness accounts that said they heard a missile and saw a c-130(military cargo plane) flying overhead just a minute or two later, also, there is no damage to the lawn as if a plane had skidded out and crashed into the building look at the wreckage again and tell me it doesn't look like an explosion from a bomb/missile with some random charred plane parts thrown in there i'm as skeptical as the next guy when it comes to these "wack-job conspiracies," but if you use your brain it makes a lot of sense hey rev if i could use that search function i could get that hour long 9/11 conspiracy video you posted a few months back |
| _____________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:04am - Man_of_the_Century ""] SacreligionNLI said:that doesn't explain why there was no debris, how all the cars WEREN'T blown away like pieces of confetti as the massive jet passed 25 ft. overhead, Yeah it does, the thread is long, its towards the end. |
| __________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:28am - SacreligionNLI ""] still not buyin it....there's no way they cleaned out the debris of a 757 that quick, and it didn't melt either....jet fuel only burns at something like 1000 degrees, and the titanium engines withstand up to 2000 and would not have been destroyed the fact that there are charred fragments doesn't prove anything maybe i'm just paranoid |
| __________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:30am - SacreligionNLI ""] not to mention...WHERE THE FUCK ARE THE WINGS!? |
| __________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:35am - SacreligionNLI ""] http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2023320890224991194&q=loose+change hour long video, directly contradicts everything in that abovetopsecret.com thread |
| ____________________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:37am - babyshaker not logged in ""] SacreligionNLI said:still not buyin it....there's no way they cleaned out the debris of a 757 that quick, and it didn't melt either....jet fuel only burns at something like 1000 degrees, and the titanium engines withstand up to 2000 and would not have been destroyed the fact that there are charred fragments doesn't prove anything maybe i'm just paranoid im with you to small to be a plane and the lawn is imacculate for having a plane just crash land on it |
| __________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:40am - SacreligionNLI ""] not to mention...WHERE THE FUCK ARE THE WINGS!? that video is pretty eye-opening...it may just be bullshit propaganda like most everything else but it brings up some good fucking points like how the WTC towers should not have collapsed by any means, the only way to knock out a building is by taking out it's base, not it's upper 1/3 |
| _____________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:41am - Man_of_the_Century ""] You're right, the engines should have survived the burning of the fuel... Thats why if you look at the pictures they are still there. The wings on the other hand are light and only made strong enough to stay together during flight. The wings would have blown into many tiny little pieces after being slammed into a building going 400 miles an hour. |
| __________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:46am - SacreligionNLI ""] there's only one identifiable part of the engine(i can picture donald rumsfeld walking by with it, dropping it, and walking away while whistling) the wings would have just fallen off, not completely vanished, they show boeing test videos in that documentary i posted, and that is exactly the case |
| _____________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:49am - Man_of_the_Century ""] I'll watch the video when I get home. |
| __________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:52am - SacreligionNLI ""] "It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them." - Donald Rumsfeld taken from an oct. 12, 2001 tape of an interview with parade magazine bad choice of words? or did he slip up? |
| __________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:54am - soloman ""] SacreligionNLI said:soloman said:Don't be conspiracy nerds. At least consider for a moment that the boeing trully hit the pentagon. This is a good read: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1 that doesn't explain why there was no debris, how all the cars WEREN'T blown away like pieces of confetti as the massive jet passed 25 ft. overhead, it didn't mention any contradictory eyewitness accounts that said they heard a missile and saw a c-130(military cargo plane) flying overhead just a minute or two later, also, there is no damage to the lawn as if a plane had skidded out and crashed into the building look at the wreckage again and tell me it doesn't look like an explosion from a bomb/missile with some random charred plane parts thrown in there i'm as skeptical as the next guy when it comes to these "wack-job conspiracies," but if you use your brain it makes a lot of sense hey rev if i could use that search function i could get that hour long 9/11 conspiracy video you posted a few months back how can you say there was no debris, and then admit that there were plane parts "thrown in there"? so according to your theory, the boeing plane never hit the pentagon. All those people that died on the plane just disappeared, along with the plane. Remember, a missle or other aircraft hitting the pentagon means that an entire boeing 757 full of people is left unaccounted for. My thing is this, if you want to believe the government consciously avoided doing anything to stop the disaster, well then yeah maybe that could be possble. But to suggest that a missle was fired at the pentagon is just ridiculous. |
| __________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:56am - SacreligionNLI ""] sorry... "virtually no debris" 100 tons of metal, gone but that's totally believable |
| ________________________________________ [May 17,2006 11:58am - midgetstealer ""] * The fact that the portion of the Pentagon attacked was nearly empty due to ongoing renovations, and that the aircraft undertook an extreme maneuver to strike this portion are strong evidence that the attack was an inside job. * The complexity and precision of the approach maneuver are nearly impossible to reconcile with the official account that the plane was piloted by Hani Hanjour, an incompetent pilot of even single-engine prop-planes. * Several eyewitness accounts suggest that the jetliner exploded before impacting the building. * The rapid clean-up of evidence of the attack, and the indications of forgery in the five video frames released by the Pentagon suggest insiders have conspired to conceal the nature of the attack. |
| __________________________________________ [May 17,2006 12:01pm - SacreligionNLI ""] exactly...sepultura said it best... "DON'T BELIEVE WHAT YOU SEE! DON'T BELIEVE WHAT YOU READ!" |